The ordinary plot line with its
exposition, climax, and descending action are not employed in Fornes’s Conduct of Life. Instead, she chooses to
leave out key details and leave the audience to speculate over her intentions.
One of the most thought provoking scenes was the last scene, where her husband
accuses Leticia of having an affair. Despite the fact that he is a torturer,
and also not being faithful, this question comes way out of left field. Fornes
does not provide extensive information on Leticia’s background. This is why it
was hard for me to understand the rational behind her refusal to acknowledge
what was happening in her very own basement.
I think that it is titled the way
it is because people may try to stick to a specific "conduct of life,"
by maintaining the status quo. However, things occur that can change people and
how they behave. Leticia does have one moment where she calls her friend Mona
and mentions the fact that her husband seems “different.” She blames is on his
work atmosphere and then proceeds onto a trivial subject. This brief acknowledgement
shows that Leticia is aware that something is not right, but doesn’t know how
to change it or express herself. Her loyalty to Orlando seems so great for not spilling
his terrible secrets, so the accusation at the end of Leticia having an affair
seems irrational. This may be because Orlando forced her to admit her infidelity
in the same way he tortured Nena.
No comments:
Post a Comment